A Blog about 88th Legislature Laws
The following backgrounds help summarize the author's views on both the general topic: Texas and more specifically 88th Legislature Laws as it relates to that topic.
Texas is truly a Republic. There are a multitude of items that to modify the state constitution must be modified. So there are times when Constitutional amendments are on the voting ballots. While I sometimes abhor the wording, the concept that all of those legally able to vote in Texas must vote on the change is a good one. And bills in Texas are generally short, making it easier for everyone to understand.
The blogs here will discuss the laws passed by Congress and signed into law, as well as those, passed by Congress and approved by the voters to become law. There are a multitude of laws and each time I post blogs I will notate here the current effective date if it is different from prior blogs. I am currently posting bills that took effect immediately - those bills total 336. I am currently posting regarding larger bills, so each blog covers a single bill.
HB 5174 - Setting a consortium to do something under the Government that does not need to be handled there.
HB 5202 - A database to list those convicted of sexual assault, assault, continuous family violence, aggravated assault, or aggravated sexual assault.
SB 63 - Placing these instructions on commissions Internet website because that should, or possibly was, already done.
SB 380 - Interpreter services for indigent parties are paid by the court.
Published: 2024-05-09
If the Universities and colleges in Texas could not already figure out that semiconductor is a great area of focus, then the people in charge should not be running a university. If they cannot move forward in an area without the need for a consortium, then the government is hamstringing the public higher education in Texas. If our government leaders actually believe that without a government led consortium the industry won't be doing what they are already doing, then they should not be in office either. This is absolutely ridiculous. I foresee in the next 4-6 years, a ballot measure to move the funding out of the general revenue fund to 'free up' the consortium to do what they need to do. Which will really be code for overspending your tax dollars. They will waste them in areas that do not need this kind of government intervention. Seriously the state should always be looking to keep encouraging business and industry to be in Texas. The education system should always be looking to provide support through education for those industries. There is no need to develop a focused area for semiconductor unless it is to spend your tax money uselessly to enrich some group.
The purposes of the consortium are:
The consortium is composed of a designee of each of the following:
The consortium is administratively attached to the office of the governor. The office shall provide the staff and facilities necessary. The consortium will be governed by an executive committee composed of:
The duties of the executive committee include developing a statewide strategic plan for the consortium; soliciting recommendations from consortium members on funding and research opportunities; appointing an executive director of the consortium and setting the executive director salary; preparing and submitting a report. By December 1 of each even-numbered year, a report shall be submitted to the governor and Legislative Budget Board that outlines:
They created a Texas Semiconductor Innovation Fund within the general revenue fund. It consists of grants, gifts, or donations; and money from other any other source designated by the legislature. The money can be used to provide matching funds to state entities and award grants to business entities involved in semiconductor manufacturing and design projects. It may also be used for staff support services, but this must be approved by the Legislative Budget Board.
The department may not charge for processing an electronic inquiry made through the use of the Internet for public information for certain violent offenses covered by Government Code Section 411.1355 or Code of Criminal Procedure 62.005. The department shall maintain a computerized central database of information regarding persons convicted on 2 or more occasion of:
The information in the database is public information with the exception of the person's social security number, driver's license number, telephone number, or information that would identify the victim of the offense. The database shall contain the following:
A person's ability to remove their information shall be notated on the website through which a search may be conducted. Anyone included may petition to have their information removed if:
The instruction guide must include:
The guide will be available on the Internet website of the commission and the Texas Veterans Commission.
This seems more like a let me pat myself on the back for writing and/or passing this legislation. I'm not saying it is not a good idea but I cannot imagine that this information is not and was not already available.
If a party has filed a statement of inability to afford to payment of court costs, and it has not been challenged and stricken, then the party is not required to provide or pay the cost of an interpreter. This does not apply to services for individuals who are deaf, hard of hearing, or have communication disabilities. Those are provided free of charge pursuant to federal and state laws.
Each county auditor, or person designated, must provide the Office of Court Administration of the Texas Judicial System with information on the money spent for interpreters in the prior fiscal year. This shall be done by December 1 of each year and also published in the office's Internet website. It should include:
Webpage created by and for J.B. Williams, J.D. - all rights reserved