Legislative Blog
J.B. Williams, J.D.
No Mandates Act HR403
A Blog about No Vaccine Mandates 2023
A Bit of Background
The following backgrounds help summarize the author's views on both the general topic: Federal and more specifically No Vaccine Mandates 2023 as it relates to that topic.
Brief Summary of Federal
This should be a fairly limited bills area for management the overall structures like highways, military, federal buildings, federal laws, and the like. However it has become the micro manager of all micro managers. They get involved in areas that no federal government should be involved in, and shift more power upward. This has led to each party trying to run over the other party in the eyes of the voters, all the while doing everything possible to maintain their power. They do this by holding onto all of the money, and claiming they know best how it should be spent. But they run debts so badly that no one should be looking to them as an example of anything other than the way to overspend and go further into debt.
Summary of No Vaccine Mandates 2023
These bills would prevent mandates concerning COVID19 vaccines. Multiple variants have been proposed.
Blog Summary
118S403 Introduced in 1/20/23 at 3 pages long. Passed in House on _________. Passed in Senate __________. Signed into law __________.
DescriptionSponsors:
- Dan Bishop, R, North Carolina, In Congress 2023 to Present
It merely prohibits the Federal government from enacting mandates on individuals. Some of the mandates were already struck down. I feel they should all have been struck down.
No Mandates Act HR403
Published: 2023-11-15
This bill was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability.
It would prohibit any agency from making any rule, regulation or guidance requiring an individual to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. It further prohibits proof of a COVID-19 vaccine for access to Federal property or Federal services or for access to congressional grounds or services.
It goes on to restrict private entities, that received Federal funding under a COVID-19 package, from requiring a COVID-19 vaccination from customers in order to receive services from the entity.
While I agree that the Federal government should not be mandating a vaccine in order for anyone to access Federal property or Federal services, I do not like the Federal government telling private businesses what they can or cannot do. If a private entity wants to require proof of COVID-19 vaccination, then they may do so. However, doing so may mean that many individuals choose to not go there, regardless of their vaccine status.
While I could see this Act being limited to no Federal government mandates, I do not understand why it was introduced, and merely sits in committee. I've yet to see a bill pass that stops mandates on a vaccine that has only ever been approved for Emergency use. A flu or flu-like illness is not an emergency, and we need to stop treating it like it is the end of the world. Pharmaceutical companies have made billions of dollars. It is fine for the vaccines to be available to those that choose to take them, but requiring them should not be done by the Federal government. Nor should the Federal government, via taxpayer dollars, be paying to continue to develop, modify and market them.
Webpage created by and for J.B. Williams, J.D. - all rights reserved